CJ Williams ← All Work

Case Study

SurveyDIG

Rebuilding higher-ed surveys for every device and every reader — student completion up 45%, 100% screen-reader accessible.

SurveyDIG
Client
SurveyDIG — Runner EDQ's sister company. Course evaluations, tests, and student-experience surveys used by 60+ universities and thousands of professors and administrators
Role
Lead Product Designer & Front-End Developer
Timeline
2015 – 2020
Team
In-house at Runner EDQ, alongside backend engineers

Product Research · UX Design · Front-End Development · Accessibility · Higher Ed

The Challenge

Course evaluations only work if students actually finish them — and students take surveys on whatever device is in their hand, in whatever context they're in, with whatever assistive technology they rely on. The legacy survey front end wasn't built for any of that.

The product serves both sides of the classroom: students taking tests and completing course surveys, and the evaluation of professors and university administrators. I led product research, design, and front-end development for the product and its marketing website.

What I Did

01 The Responsive Form Rebuild

The student survey front end predated the devices students actually used — long evaluation forms that fought small screens.

A complete rebuild of the survey front-end framework: fully responsive, so students can take surveys and tests on any device, anywhere there's a connection. Try the live form pattern below.

The responsive evaluation form — a live CodePen of the rebuilt pattern

02 Accessible to Every Student

Accessibility wasn't a feature of the legacy forms — it was a gap, and universities answer to accessibility requirements.

Accessibility built into the rebuilt framework and verified by testing: a 60% increase in accessibility scoring, and 100% screen-reader accessibility across the survey experience.

03 Both Sides of the Classroom

Students, professors, and administrators all touch the product with entirely different jobs to do.

Designed for the full loop — students completing tests and course surveys, and the evaluation flows for professors and university admin on the other side.

The product marketing site — also part of the role
The product marketing site — also part of the role

The Outcome

45%Increase in student form completion
60%Increase in accessibility scoring and testing
100%Screen-reader accessible

Accessibility and responsiveness weren't polish — they were the product thesis. Rebuilding the forms around every device and every reader raised student completion 45%, which is the number a course-evaluation product lives or dies by.